Adam Scott Actor

On Monday, the House is scheduled to vote on the bulb (HR 2417), a misguided bill that repeal of the energy efficiency standards for light bulbs that were enacted in 2007. The rhetoric surrounding this legislation limiting the absurd. The Wall Street Journal, in a blistering opinion that attacked the "policeman of the bulb," falsely claimed that "Washington the ban on the sale of conventional incandescent bulbs." It's time to shine some light on the facts of this debate.

Efficiency standards were enacted by the new Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007. This bipartisan bill, signed by President George W. Bush, only requires that new sources of light energy 25 to 30 percent less than traditional incandescent bulbs. No bulbs are prohibited. No consumer will be forced to use a type of light bulb over other types.

Many Americans, myself included, appreciate the soft yellow glow of incandescent light bulbs invented by Edison New Jersey's own Thomas in the 19th century. Anyone who chooses to continue with these light bulbs can surely do it. Manufacturers have already invented efficient incandescent bulbs that meet the new standards. Its light is identical to the projected major focus, however, are almost 30 percent more efficient and save the average family $ 100 in energy costs each year. Nationally, amounting to $ 12 billion in annual savings. Even higher efficiency incandescent bulbs are in development, such as LED bulbs that mimic incandescent light bulbs. In fact, my wife and I have already installed the LED lights on the part of our home.

So let's put aside the misleading rhetoric and consider the facts. The United States has a long tradition of support for innovation by establishing energy efficiency standards. For example, the United States requires automakers to meet fuel economy standards, now set at 30 miles per gallon. As a result, the fuel efficiency of new cars has doubled since the rules were enacted. Similarly, Congress has required manufacturers to create new refrigerators with more energy efficient. However, we have not heard any calls back to turn-of-the-century Model T or ice boxes - technologies that are about as old as the conventional light bulb.

The new light bulb energy standards build on these policy successes of the past. They will save our nation energy and save our money to consumers. On the other hand, have promoted technological innovation and jobs created. Since Congress acted four years ago, manufacturers have devised a series of new low energy efficient light bulbs. Lighting companies have also invested significant capital and resources in research, development and new technologies - exactly the type of investment that our economy desperately needs. Repealing the rules would frustrate these developments bulb and America lost jobs and money.

It's time to separate fact from fiction. Congress should vote against efforts to repeal the light bulb efficiency standards.